🔗 Share this article

The acclaimed actor is likely the perfect pick for a bold scary movie about the biblical figure, though not for the causes many audiences could guess. Truthfully, the star does not actually play the central religious figure in the new film: his character is credited only as a craftsman. He is cast as the Joseph within this story, working to uphold his faith while his son (acted by Noah Jupe), his adolescent adopted son, commences to display divine powers. The reason it’s difficult to imagine a different leading star playing this part is that even as the figure becomes burdened with multiple challenges, Cage himself looks almost touchingly confident that this dark, somber little movie is deserving of his effort.

Cage's Current Film Selections

Cage was using those years more carefully recently. He yet stars in more films than most average viewers may ever watch — for example, were you informed that the actor has completed a trio of different cowboy movies over the last few years? — yet he also adds esteemed independent films for example one recent hit, Pig, and a further title. This new film sounds like one of those, as it’s genre-adjacent, possibly controversial, and approaches a campy-sounding description quite seriously.

Movie's Plot and Execution

Regrettably, filmmaker the director does not reward that serious attention. The film starts from a interestingly wandering place, positioned as inspired by an apocryphal lost gospel about the youthful days of the messiah. Cage's character, the maternal figure, and the boy move from place to place, anxious of doctrinal intolerance or suspicion over their son's mysterious gifts. “Disaster trails us,” The Carpenter gloomily remarks. That continues when dark forces attack the household in their latest settlement, getting a jump-start with that well-known scriptural test for the son.

At times, the film resembles an demonic possession-type supernatural thriller, except that no one of the lead characters are directly possessed. Rather, they become progressively isolated from one another, as these entities affect a local young woman (the actress, named an outsider) who The Boy connects to, and presents all disturbing images of a dark tomorrow. The Carpenter notably grapples with his role in the narrative, at times scolding his child who mystifies him.

Debate and Sensitivity

The subject matter is prone to invite debate, and Nathan handles it with a lot of sensitivity — overly, possibly. The idea of a young man facing his eventual sacrifice and lured by dark influences is certainly terrifying, but the filmmaker might be wary of seeming gratuitous and anxious to telegraph his intentions, thus he frequently withdraws to darkly ominous visuals. The figures continually reflect — the singer-actress, who demonstrated genuine potential in another movie, interestingly — cedes her acting to her character's costume, occasionally interrupted by a few gruesome scary visuals.

Cage's Performance and Film's Weaknesses

At the same time, Cage flirts with exactly the kind of melodramatic acting that those who enjoy his campier roles could be expecting. One scene (also included) in the trailer in which he loses control and screams “My belief is broken!” If that kind of theatrical release is part of your religious scary film, maybe a more brazenly silly method would take better advantage of Cage’s willingness to be extreme when necessary. Rather, the film more closely resembles the poorer direct-to-video movies Cage made through much of that period — apart from the B-movies but rather the dramas and supernatural thrillers that often seem intriguing, and often contain several notable actor's highlights, but in the end seem like, well, cheap home video fare.

Honestly, several of these, though not as grand, were more watchable in general. This is when I need to disregard my usual practice, not spiritual but career-related: Long ago, a respected mentor urged me to remove descriptive terms like “monotonous” or “lifeless” from my film-criticism vocabulary. These words communicate minimal other than a individual and generically described lack of patience, avoiding the task of clearly expressing the thoughtful and sensation of viewing a specific film. It's hard to convey boredom without seeming uninteresting yourself. It's just as unclear as terming a movie “engaging.” “Explain further,” essentially.

But I must confess, I grew weary during much of The Carpenter’s Son. In its defense, it’s a religious style of stultification, not because The Carpenter’s Son is moralizing, but since it takes a sort of patient acceptance to watch it. At some point in the beginning, the movie locks into a monotonous pattern of simmering anguish, and does not